<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Life Matters pushes against the culture of death	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mnnonline.org/news/life-matters-pushes-against-the-culture-of-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mnnonline.org/news/life-matters-pushes-against-the-culture-of-death/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=life-matters-pushes-against-the-culture-of-death</link>
	<description>Mission Network News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bradley Williams		</title>
		<link>https://www.mnnonline.org/news/life-matters-pushes-against-the-culture-of-death/#comment-723220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradley Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mnnonline.org/?post_type=news&#038;p=137742#comment-723220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your source has done you a disservice.  The promoters of assisted suicide have worn out their thesaurus attempting to imply that it is legal in Montana.  Assisted suicide is a homicide in Montana. Our MT Supreme Court ruled that if a doctor is charged with a homicide they might have a potential defense based on consent. The Court did not address civil liabilities. No one in Montana has immunity from civil or criminal prosecution. Does that sound legal to you? Oregon model bills have been rejected by our legislature in 2011, 2013 and 2015 because of gaping loopholes that allow exploitation of elders and people with disabilities of all ages by predators and predatory corporations.

Note these loopholes and more work with each other to eviscerate intended safeguards.
By all these OR model laws all family members are not required to be contacted, hold that thought.  A single predatory heir is allowed to steer the sign up and then execute the lethal process without a witness.
A witness is not required to confirm that the dose was so called “self administered” (you remember this was one of their lead selling points).
Even as the law provides immunity for all involved and demands the falsification of the death certificate (impossible to track trends for good public policy) it actually prohibits a public inquiry of any kind (remember the family members who were not contacted).  
These loopholes and more are in the OR, WA, and CA’s laws and expand the scope of exploitation by predators.  However, it serves the health insurance corporations very well.
There is the Oregon Tami Sawyer Thomas Middleton case of abuse for assets.
Oregon and Washington should amend their initiative-sound-bite driven dangerous laws.  California’s should be vetoed.
Also note how the promoters of assisted suicide cling to their verbally engineered polls that claim a majority is in favor.  I polled thousands of Montanans one-on-one as I served 60 days at fair booths across the state.  Once folks knew about the loopholes in all of the Oregon model bills, 95% were not for them.  So much for their verbally engineered polls.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your source has done you a disservice.  The promoters of assisted suicide have worn out their thesaurus attempting to imply that it is legal in Montana.  Assisted suicide is a homicide in Montana. Our MT Supreme Court ruled that if a doctor is charged with a homicide they might have a potential defense based on consent. The Court did not address civil liabilities. No one in Montana has immunity from civil or criminal prosecution. Does that sound legal to you? Oregon model bills have been rejected by our legislature in 2011, 2013 and 2015 because of gaping loopholes that allow exploitation of elders and people with disabilities of all ages by predators and predatory corporations.</p>
<p>Note these loopholes and more work with each other to eviscerate intended safeguards.<br />
By all these OR model laws all family members are not required to be contacted, hold that thought.  A single predatory heir is allowed to steer the sign up and then execute the lethal process without a witness.<br />
A witness is not required to confirm that the dose was so called “self administered” (you remember this was one of their lead selling points).<br />
Even as the law provides immunity for all involved and demands the falsification of the death certificate (impossible to track trends for good public policy) it actually prohibits a public inquiry of any kind (remember the family members who were not contacted).<br />
These loopholes and more are in the OR, WA, and CA’s laws and expand the scope of exploitation by predators.  However, it serves the health insurance corporations very well.<br />
There is the Oregon Tami Sawyer Thomas Middleton case of abuse for assets.<br />
Oregon and Washington should amend their initiative-sound-bite driven dangerous laws.  California’s should be vetoed.<br />
Also note how the promoters of assisted suicide cling to their verbally engineered polls that claim a majority is in favor.  I polled thousands of Montanans one-on-one as I served 60 days at fair booths across the state.  Once folks knew about the loopholes in all of the Oregon model bills, 95% were not for them.  So much for their verbally engineered polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
